Thursday, January 22, 2009

Bishop of what?

Now that all the excitement has (somewhat) calmed down from the inauguration, it's interesting to see just how "tolerant" Obama was with his invites for those who prayed and spoke at the big event. Diversity seemed to be the key word on Tuesday. As with most politicians, Obama did his best to please everyone (always a mistake) by inviting opposing clergy such as Rick Warren and Bishop V Gene Robinson. I find it interesting in the debates of gays vs. not gays just how intolerant and angry most gays are with those who are not gay and don't openly accept and condone that lifestyle.

Rick Warren applauded the President-elect this week for inviting the openly gay Episcopal Bishop V Gene Robinson to pray at the inaugural opening ceremony. “President-elect Obama has again demonstrated his genuine commitment to bringing all Americans of goodwill together in search of common ground,” Warren said in a statement. “I applaud his desire to be the president of every citizen.”

Yet Robinson gave what seems to be a typical response to Warren's invitation to pray at the inaugural event: Robinson was among the critics, calling the Warren invitation a “slap in the face”, according to The Washington Post. If those who are gay are all about "tolerance" and "diversity" why can't their response be a little more positive when someone who doesn't share their view is asked to pray or speak?

Yet to me, as a pastor myself, this is where the Bishop Robinson issue gets weird. In preparation for the event, the bishop said he has read inaugural prayers throughout history and was “horrified” at how “specifically and aggressively Christian they were”, according to the New York Times. For his prayer, Robinson said he is “very clear” that it “will not be a Christian prayer, and I won’t be quoting Scriptures or anything like that”. “The texts that I hold as sacred are not sacred texts for all Americans, and I want all people to feel that this is their prayer,” he said.
Robinson said he might make the prayer out to “the God of our many understandings”.

I'm thinking at this point that he may want to opt out of the Christian faith. Maybe he needs to be Bishop of his own religion. It's like he sort of wants to still be affiliated with Christianity by being an Episcopal Bishop, yet doesn't want to do anything crazy like say a Christian prayer at the inauguration. Brother, pick a side. And we wonder why so many non-Christians want nothing to do with our faith. I can't blame them for being confused.

And kudos to Rick Warren for accepting the invitation to pray and doing such a good job on Tuesday.

4 comments:

Paulla said...

Evan,

Well said.

And I have to say, I cracked up at your line: "It's like he sort of wants to still be affiliated with Christianity by being an Episcopal Bishop, yet doesn't want to do anything crazy like say a Christian prayer at the inauguration."

Crazy indeed.

I agree Rick Warren did a great job; in fact, I was pretty stunned at his prayer. I'm sure there will be many protests to it. Oh well.

Paulla

Connie said...

I agree with your post, though I never heard the bishop's prayer... I heard Rick Warren's and I thought it was great and couldn't believe anyone was offended by it. The reality is you can't please everyone. That bishop is probably one of those people who thinks tolerance is equal to support....

Harry the Hobo Widdifield said...

There are no "sides". There is a variance of opinion, but that which makes us the same is greater than that which makes us different. The fish in a school of fish all swim divergent paths, but yet they still swim as a school. The sooner Christians come to terms with their own humanity...realize that we are all trying to swim the same direction, the sooner Christians will stop assuming that there are two sides, or that there is even an argument. I personally thought Rick Warren's "prayer" was pompous and preachy. I prefer Reverend Lowery's prayer, one that seemed to truly enjoy his relationship with his maker. Of course, old men come unimpeded by the trappings of appropriate behavior. They simply do their thing. There is wisdom in that. Who among us is perfect enough that we have the right to point out specks in each others' eyes?

Neil said...

Hey Evan,

Glad to hear things are going good for you and the family up there.

It seems as though being a true follower of Christ is going to be more controversial.

Who would have thought that voting yes on prop 8 california would be looked at as "hateful or denying rights?"

As we enter end times, I believe more religious figures will compromise the truth.

So when's surf season?